Assessments and Rubrics (by M.C. Wade)

Definitions of Rubric Scale Terms

RATING
DEFINITION
4 Exceeds
Standard
Fully demonstrated:
  • exceeds the assignment requirements
  • continually seeks opportunities to learn and apply new skills
  • consistently exhibits behaviors that positively impact learning and the classroom climate
  • serves as a role model to peers
3 Meets
Standard
Substantially demonstrated:
  • meets the assignment requirements
  • demonstrates willingness to learn and apply new skills
  • exhibits behaviors that positively impact learning and the classroom climate
2 Needs
Improvement
Partially demonstrated:
  • requires support in meeting the requirements
  • results in less than quality work performance
  • leads to areas for academic improvement being jointly identified and planned between the teacher and parent
1 Unsatisfactory
Not demonstrated:
  • does not meet the requirements contained in the assignment
  • may result in the student not being recommended for promotion to next grade

Formative Assessment Rubric


MEASURABLES
4 - Fully Demonstrated
3 - Substantially Demonstrated
2 - Partially Demonstrated
1 - Not Demonstrated
Score
I. Mathematical Knowledge





Parent comments





Teacher comments





II. Language Arts





Parent comments





Teacher comments





III. Critical Strategies





Parent comments





Teacher comments





IV. Cooperation





Parent comments











V. Intellectual Curiosity





Parent comments





Teacher comments





VI. Application of Knowledgebase





Parent comments





Teacher comments





VII. Self-directed Learning





Parent comments





Teacher comments





VIII. Resource Use





Parent comments





Teacher comments





TOTAL POINTS:__

Summative Assessment Rubric

Criterion 1: Habits of Mind
RATING
DEFINITION
SCORE
4 Thorough Understanding
  • Works in an orderly manner and adheres to a timeline
  • Reacts positively to feedback and incorporates appropriate suggestions
  • Consistently demonstrates insight and sensitivity toward the feelings and knowledge base of others

3 Good Understanding
  • Works in an orderly manner and completes task on time
  • Does not react negatively to feedback
  • Demonstrates insight and sensitivity into the feelings and knowledge base of others with few exceptions

2 Satisfactory Understanding
  • Project is completed on time
  • Reacts appropriately to feedback with some prompting
  • Generally demonstrates insight and sensitivity into the feelings and knowledge base of others with prompting

1 Needs Improvement
  • Project is completed, but past due date
  • Demonstrates sensitivity to the feelings of others with prompting

Criterion 2: Complex Thinking
(Complex thinking skills: compare, contrast, evaluate, analyze, abstract, create, induce, deuce, project, predict, decide, synthesize)

4 Thorough Understanding
  • Demonstrates a clear understanding of the purpose of the activity (to represent a particular perspective) and consistently strives toward that goal
  • Demonstrates master of a variety of complex thinking processes

3 Good Understanding
  • Demonstrates a good understanding of the purpose of the activity and strives toward that goal with few behaviors inconsistent with assigned perspective
  • Uses a variety of complex thinking processes appropriately

2 Satisfactory Understanding
  • Demonstrates some understanding of the purpose of the activity but does not consistently stay within assigned perspective
  • Uses a variety of complex thinking skills, with some difficulty

1 Needs Improvement
  • Does not address the goal of the activity
  • Does not demonstrate critical thinking skills

Criterion 3: Effective Communication

4 Thorough Understanding
  • Uses a variety of means to clearly, effectively, and convincingly communicate main ideas
  • Expresses the assigned perspective with clarity and conviction

3 Good Understanding
  • Uses two or more means to clearly communicate main ideas
  • Expresses the assigned perspective with reasonable clarity

2 Satisfactory Understanding
  • Uses two or more means to communicate main ideas, but communication is unclear in one or more areas
  • Expresses the assigned perspective without serious misrepresentations

1 Needs Improvement
  • Attempts to communicate main ideas, but serious errors or omissions hinder communication
  • Attempts to express the assigned perspective, with limited success

Criterion 4: Information Processing

4 Thorough Understanding
  • Selects an option that clearly reflects the priorities of assigned perspective
  • Provides convincing and accurate support for chosen option and evidence against all other options

3 Good Understanding
  • Selects an option that incorporates some of the priorities of assigned perspective
  • Provides strong and accurate support for chosen option and some evidence against some other options

2 Satisfactory Understanding
  • The chosen option does not directly conflict with the most important priorities of the assigned perspective
  • Provides some support for the chosen option

1 Needs Improvement
  • An attempt is made to relate the chosen option to the assigned perspective
  • The chosen option is stated, but reasons for the choice are not clearly stated

TOTAL POINTS:
cybergogue-banner-2011.jpg